MDT review & certification

MDT certification and independent review

Practical guidance and structured assessment for multidisciplinary teams in independent healthcare. Understand current practice, identify improvements and demonstrate good governance.

Illustrative image of healthcare professionals discussing multidisciplinary care

Support for effective MDT working

Guidance, independent feedback and certification, from everyday meeting practice to a structured assessment.

Best practice guidance

Explore guidance on team composition, meeting organisation, decision-making and governance.
Explore the guidance →

Expert advice

Get an independent perspective on MDT workflows, with feedback tailored to the clinical setting.
Discuss a review →

MDT certification

Assess MDT processes through self-assessment, expert observation and attendance review.
Explore certification →

From assessment to assurance

A structured review. A practical purpose.

Each stage builds a clearer picture of MDT working and the evidence behind it.

  1. 01

    Assess current practice

    Bring together self-assessment and supporting information.

    A clear starting point
  2. 02

    Independent review

    Combine expert observation with a review of team attendance.

    An external perspective
  3. 03

    Identify improvements

    Recognise strengths and areas that need further attention.

    Practical priorities
  4. 04

    Demonstrate good practice

    Receive certification when the assessment requirements are met.

    Evidence of achievement
How Arcadent assessment works →
Illustrative image of two clinicians reviewing information together

A clearer view of MDT practice

Examine team organisation, the information available for discussion and the way decisions are recorded.

Turn review into improvement

Build on established strengths and identify practical changes through guidance and independent feedback.

Research in perspective · 2017

Making time for MDT discussion

NHS England cites a Cancer Research UK study which found that around half of patients were discussed for two minutes or less.

A historical finding that informed cancer MDT streamlining guidance, rather than a measure of current practice.

Around half of patient discussions

Approximate proportion, shown as 50% for illustration. Source: NHS England guidance (2020), p. 3, citing Cancer Research UK (2017). Not Arcadent performance data.

Guidance in context

What should effective MDT working support?

NHS England’s guidance on streamlining cancer MDT meetings sets out three aims. These provide useful context for reviewing meeting processes.

Cancer MDT guidance · Published January 2020

Three aims of NHS England’s cancer MDT streamlining guidance
FocusIntended benefit
Time for complex casesMore discussion time for cases that need full multidisciplinary input.
Effective use of expertiseMore flexible meetings that make better use of clinical and diagnostic time.
Consistency of careAgreed care pathways that improve transparency and consistency.

Source: NHS England & NHS Improvement, MDT streamlining guidance, executive summary, p. 2. These are guidance aims, not measured outcomes of Arcadent certification.

Also read: IHPN Multidisciplinary Team Working Report (PDF) →

Discuss the next step

Considering certification or a review of MDT working? Tell us about the clinical setting and the support needed.

We can explain the assessment process and discuss how Arcadent can help.

Illustrative photograph of three healthcare professionals talking in a hospital corridor
Illustrative clinical team

Contact Us

Protected by Google reCAPTCHA. Privacy · Terms